2014/12/27

Royal Commission 'prejudiced and biased': CFMEU leader

Chris Slee writes that Royal Commission 'prejudiced and biased': CFMEU leader.

By accusing the CFMEU of blackmail, the Royal Commission is trying to portray any industrial action (apart from the very limited forms allowed by Australia's highly restrictive laws) as a crime. Union officials (and by implication rank and file union members) who carry out such industrial action are portrayed as criminals. The royal commission is also preparing the ground for even more severe restrictions on workers' rights.

Emphasis Mine

Any defiance against the ruling class is a crime. A crime is defying the natural order of things.

And since Capitalism is currently the true natural order of things, workers who ask for and fight for decent working conditions and wages are against the natural order of things in which the Capitalists alone determine what is right and fair.


Read more!

Asking why

Seth Godin is Asking why.

If we keep asking why all the way to the beginning of the thread, we might come to understand how it is that this is the way we do things around here. And then realize that we might come out ahead if we care enough to change it.

Emphasis Mine

We should ask why a Capitalist society is so racist? Why did Malcolm X conclude that you cannot have Capitalism without racism?

We should ask why a Capitalist society is so sexist?

We should ask why a Capitalist society is so homophobic?

We should ask why a Capitalist society is so xenophobic?

We should ask why the disabled are so discriminated against in a Capitalist society?


Read more!

Underinvesting in the public good

Dan Little writes about Underinvesting in the public good.

Failure to achieve these kinds of social gains through public investment might seem like a very basic element of injustice within our society. But it also looks like strong evidence of system failure: the political and economic system fail to bring about as much public good as is possible in the circumstances. The polity is stuck somewhere on the low shoulders of the climb towards maximum public benefit for minimum overall investment. It is analogous to the situation in private economic space where there are substantial obstacles to the flow of investment, leaving substantial possible sources of gain untapped. It is s situation of massive collective inefficiency, quite the contrary of Adam Smith's view of the happy outcomes of the hidden hand and the market mechanism.

Emphasis Mine

This is not evidence of a systemic failure. The system is working fine for the Capitalists. Their wealth are at all-time high. They are garnering a greater share of the GDP through record profits.

What Little is referring to is the failure of this wealth to be properly invested for the benefit of the whole society. This does not happen in a class-based society: the ruling class looks after itself. They only need to spend enough to keep the rest of us in line through propaganda, policing, and military.

Over half of the US Government budget is spent on the military, and that spending is bigger than the next biggest 25 countries in the world combined. So much poverty and death could be avoided if that money was spent there instead on the US military. But no, the wealth and power of the rich has to be protected at all costs.

Real social investment can only occur when the working class takes control of the economy and polity in order to direct investment into areas of most social need.


Read more!

South Africa: United Front takes steps to redefine politics

Dinga Sikwebu writes South Africa: United Front takes steps to redefine politics.

First, the assembly asserted the principles of democratic plurality, diversity, political tolerance and respect for different views within the front. Participants committed themselves to politics of mutual listening and learning where participating organisations and individuals influence each other.

The adopted resolutions warn against any know-all pretences and reliance on trans-historical blueprints. Referring areas on which different organisations did not see eye to eye on back to constituencies was therefore no train smash.

The assembly agreed that the front must be a learning space where organisations travel together, discover solutions jointly and unlearn oppressive, undemocratic and sexist methods of organisation and struggle.

The second way in which the United Front hopes to inculcate different politics is to call on all those who associate with the coalition to acknowledge their own weaknesses and adopt politics of consistency that call on all, to actively reflect on and address their own racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia and privilege. The personal is political and there is no room within the front for talking left and walking right.

Third, the organisations that were at the assembly committed themselves to confidence-building struggles where they fight for winnable demands while also democratically re-imagining and building their long-term vision of an egalitarian society.

Although there are no guarantees of success, the United Front hopes to build a mass movement in this country through galvanising the tributaries of ongoing struggles into a torrent.

Those who define politics as a game within the purview of parliamentarians, political parties or paid politicians will remain blind to attempts by delegates at the meeting in December to put actions of ordinary people to determine their destiny as the real politics.

Equally, for those who equate politics with contests that we hold every five years, mass campaigns involving millions of people acting directly through their movements will not easily fit into their narrow political boxes.

They will fail to appreciate the steps that ordinary are taking to reclaim mass politics and through their actions transform themselves from being political subjects into being political agents.

Emphasis Mine

Because we all have been indoctrinated into a sexist, homophobic, racist, and xenophobic society, every day becomes a struggle to consciously overcome this conditioning.

In this everyday struggle, the personal is definitely political for every action and thought we do and have builds our political future. If I want a racist future, then I behave differently to and think differently about white and non-white people. Even this division of the world into a binary of white and non-white contributes to the racism in the world.

There is so much unlearning to be done, and the journey is long and hard. As we do, we should assist others along the same journey by forgiving them and ourselves for the mistakes we make. No one is truly free of this cultural pollution.


Read more!

2014/12/26

How the top brass undermined WWI soldiers' attempts to 'live and let live'

Barry Healy writes How the top brass undermined WWI soldiers' attempts to 'live and let live'.

In the final months of the war, half of all German reserves failed to report for duty. Deserting German soldiers commandeered trains to take them home. The Kaiser and his upper officers considered bombing them, but the lower officers refused to do it.

Finally, in November 1918 German sailors in Hamburg mutinied and established a soviet in the city. The Kaiser fled the country and the war was over.

After the November 11, 1918 armistice, desertions and mutinies spread to the British soldiers who wanted to go home immediately. That stopped then-prime minister David Lloyd George from sending troops to occupy Germany.

Lloyd George said: “Germany was like a cholera area infected with the virus of Bolshevism.”

WWI ended because millions of workers pressed into uniform refused to fight any longer. Between now and 2018, the corporate media will tell us that glorious battles were fought and stalwart Diggers won great victories. Those will be falsehoods.

We must remember and honour those brave people who were lied to and manipulated by cynical imperialists and sent to the madness of WWI.

The memorial we must build them is an anti-war movement that says that never again will we allow working-class people to be sent to the slaughter in the service of their enemies at home.

Emphasis Mine

Yet this did not stop the Imperialists sending Australian, American, Japanese, Canadian, and other troops into Russia to fight the Bolsheviks.


Read more!

Choices

Seth Godin writes about Choices.

Non-obvious actions taken in obvious moments, difficult decisions that might be easier to avoid, responses instead of reactions, and most of all, the choices we make when it doesn't even seem like we have a choice—all of these, taken together, define who we are and the impact we make.

Emphasis Mine

It would be easier for us if we didn't stand up for refugees, for Muslims, for Aborigines, for Unions. Then we would have to run into the blind prejudice when we try to get our message out.

But our message is about building an inclusive society in which everyone has a say, participates, and benefits from. If we did not have that foundation, then our message is completely worthless!


Read more!

The meritocracy trap

Seth Godin warns against The meritocracy trap.

CULTURE is something we create, and culture works against pure merit. That's because culture creates insulation and connections and histories that count at least as much as the pure horsepower of merit.

HEAD STARTS get compounded. Early success gives people the resources, confidence and connections that can be used to create later success.

LOCK IN means that organizations and ideas can succeed far longer than they would without it. You don't give up on a social network or smart phone merely because one element of it isn't the best available one. It's easier to stick than to switch.

Emphasis Mine

One of the great myths in Capitalism is that of meritocracy. It says that the Capitalists are rewarded for their efforts.

In fact, Capitalist profit through a cluture that accepts and defends the private ownership of the means of production. The Europeans had a head start in the Capitalism race through the early accumulation of Capital. And Capitalists benefit through the lock-in enforced by the IMF, World Bank, WTO, and various “free-trade agreements”.


Read more!

Challenging the Divine Right of Big Energy

Rebecca Solnit is Challenging the Divine Right of Big Energy.

How will we get to where we need to be? No one knows, but we do know that we must keep moving in the direction of reduced carbon emissions, a transformed energy economy, an escape from the tyranny of fossil fuel, and a vision of a world in which everything is connected. The story of this coming year is ours to write and it could be a story of Year One in the climate revolution, of the watershed when popular resistance changed the fundamentals as much as the people of France changed their world (and ours) more than 200 [years] ago.

Two hundred years hence, may someone somewhere hold in their hands a document from 2021, in wonder, because it was written during Year Six of the climate revolution, when all the old inevitabilities were finally being swept aside, when we seized hold of possibility and made it ours. “Any human power can be resisted and changed by human beings,” says Ursula K. Le Guin. And she’s right, even if it’s the hardest work we could ever do. Now, everything depends on it.

Emphasis Mine

The primary lesson of the French Revolution was that people were willing to step into the unknown, away from the safety and comfort of the known. But it had taken the collapse of the familiar for them to attempt this. Before that, they had tried to convert an absolute monarchy into a constitutional one, and to curb the excessive privileges of the aristocracy and the clergy.

It was only when the modest reforms were rebuffed and resisted that reformism turned into revolution. Even though the radicalism of the Jacobians was crushed, and a new ruling class of bourgeoisie appeared, Napoleon Bonaparte had to acknowledge and contain the residual radicalism of the populace in a balancing act.

Even the restoration of the Bourbons was not secure against the agitation of the populace. Revolts flared up in 1830, 1848, 1870 with the latter giving rise to the first worker-led government in the world. This was the 70 day reign of the Paris Commune as the workers defended Paris against the Prussian army while the French army ran away.

We must go through the charade of carbon-taxes, cap-and-trade, RET, and other market-based instruments as Capitalism tries to assimilate environmental policies into its mechanisms. This is what Trotsky calls the old system trying to solve problems in its own way.

These are doomed to fail because they crash against the very foundation of Capitalism: the private ownership of the means of production. You cannot force an individual to dispose of their property in a way contrary to their wishes without encountering serious resistance.

Public ownership and democratic control of the means of production is the only way forward. It only remains to be seen how long it takes people to realise that this is the case.


Read more!

2014/12/23

How U.S. Torture Led to the Rise of ISIS

Barry Ritholtz describes how How U.S. Torture Led to the Rise of ISIS.

Indeed, many of the top ISIS commanders — including Abu Ayman al-Iraqi and Abu Abdulrahman al-Bilawi — were high-level Iraqi officers under Saddam Hussein who were imprisoned at Camp Bucca by American forces.

There was unquestionably widespread torture at Camp Bucca …

Emphasis Mine

And let's not forget how the CIA gave rise to Al-Qaeda, and through Pakistan's ISI, the Taliban.

Mark Thoma asks What is Wrong with Us?

I find it incredibly sad that people feel they have to make "The Case Against Torture" (NY Times). What is wrong with us?

Emphasis Mine

What do the ruling class care if more terrorists are created? What do they care about the morality or efficacy of torture? The only thing they care about is their continued grip on power.

Since reason has failed as a support for their leadership, then terror and fear will have to do. The more we are frightened and terrorised, the more we need the ruling class.

And it not the rulers, ensconced in their green zones, who are at risk, but we, in the red zone. It is we who have to bear the brunt of the anger, hatred, and reprisals.

We, the workers, have to overcome our fear of the other, our dependence on the Capitalists, our inadequacies in controlling our destinies. Are we to be forever frightened children? Can we not be confident and prudent adults, instead?


Read more!

Matzpen: Revolutionary anti-Zionism in Israel

Doug Enaa Greene writes on Matzpen: Revolutionary anti-Zionism in Israel.

Before moving onto Matzpen's analysis of Zionism, I'd like to discuss its views on the Israeli working class, both Jews and Palestinians. As Marxists, Matzpen shared the very fundamental idea that the working class is the key force for revolutionary change in society. Yet that still leaves us to ask: what role, if any, did Matzpen see Jewish workers playing in the struggle? To answer this question, Matzpen posed the following questions: How did Zionist colonisation shape the consciousness and organisation of Jewish workers? What effect did imperialism play in the formation of Jewish workers?

Matzpen's views were elaborated most succinctly in a 1969 article entitled The Class Structure of Israel, by Moshe Machover and Akiva Orr. The three factors that the article sees as most decisive in shaping Israeli society and its working class are the following:

1. In the late 1960s, Israel was composed largely of Jewish immigrants or children of immigrants. Immigrants saw their arrival in Israel as a chance for upward social advancement and to better their station in life through hard work. Many immigrants to Israel were more likely to identify their social position by geographic or ethnic origin, which was a major barrier to the formation of revolutionary class consciousness.

2. Second, and probably most importantly, Israel is not just a nation of immigrants but of settlers and colonisers who dispossess, expel and occupy Palestine. Jewish labour unions, kibbutzim and land purchases (or theft) were thus predicated on the overriding objective of expelling the indigenous population and establishing a supremacy of the Jewish settlers. Israeli Jewish workers along with capitalists had very much to gain from the national oppression and expulsion of Palestinians. The struggle between indigenous Palestinians and Zionist settlers is still ongoing and it shapes all of Israeli society.

Yet in Israel, there is class differentiation between an Israeli bourgeoisie, along with a privileged European-Ashkenazi Jewish workers, and poorer Mizrahim Jews lacking union protection and social services. However, all Jews in Israel, no matter how poor, are considered citizens and receive privileges as compared to the richest Palestinian, since they are part of the Zionist “Jewish State” and support racist measures. They rally to the government during wars or other national “emergencies”.

Below the Israeli Jewish population are the Palestinians in the occupied territories and in Israel, who make up 20% of the population. In Israel's pre-1967 borders, Palestinians are a reserve army of labour, receive poor wages, lack of union protection, social benefits, health care, lack of access to land and education compared to Israeli Jews. Palestinians are also second-class citizens and considered a fifth column in Israel (until 1966 Palestinians were under military rule). They are denied both democratic and national rights as Palestinians by the Israeli state, which declares itself to be a Jewish state.

3. Privileges for Jews are maintained by way of Israel's connections with imperialism through capital investment, subsidies and billions in military aid. This aid, distributed by the state and the official trade unions, went to pay for social programs, housing, financing employment, and maintaining the standard of living for Israeli Jews. Thus Israel is a society that has a standard of living far beyond what is produced.

At the time Matzpen made its analysis, the number of immigrants in Israel had declined and more people had been born there. Second, in the early 1970s Israel's state sector controlled more than 50% of the economy. Since the 1980s, there has been a major wave of privatisation from kibbutzim to welfare, which has produced a highly unequal income distribution.

However, neoliberalism has not fundamentally altered the attitudes of Israeli Jews in regards to Zionism. For example, during 2011 protests, inspired by the Arab Spring, in favour of social justice, Palestinian demands and issues were largely absent. During the recent Gaza war nearly 90% of Israeli Jews supported the government's wanton slaughter of Palestinians.

Whatever class differences Israeli Jews may have, as part of an oppressor nationality that uses state power to enforce an apartheid system, they band together in the face of the Palestinian and Arab “threat”. The conclusion that Matzpen offered in this regard is still valid:

In the context of Israeli society it means that as long as Zionism is politically and ideologically dominant within that society, and forms the accepted framework of politics, there is no chance whatsoever of the Israeli working class becoming a revolutionary class. The experience of 50 years does not contain a single example of Israeli workers being mobilised on material or trade-union issues to challenge the Israeli regime itself; it is impossible to mobilise even a minority of the proletariat in this way. On the contrary, Israeli workers nearly always put their national loyalties before their class loyalties.

Emphasis Mine

This is true of all settler societies such Australia, USA, and Canada. Workers are comforted in their aspirational ideas of advancemnet through the Capitalist system despite the rigours of neo-liberalism.

And as recent news has shown, the workers will take the side of the oppressors when it comes to police brutality and state torture. Indeed, all workers nearly always put their national loyalties before their class loyalties.

A hundred years ago, the Second International collapsed as socialist parties rushed to support their country's entry into the First World War. All of that internationalism of the Socialists came to nought in face of the Capitalists' call to arms.

This is still true today as the Australian governments promote the ideal of ANZAC legend to foster militarism among the young. Capitalists know that this is a proven way of keeping the workers under control through the mythology of patriotism.


Read more!

The *Other* Torture Report: What the USA looks like to the World

Rebecca Gordon comments on The *Other* Torture Report: What the USA looks like to the World.

Why should an international body focused specifically on torture care about an apparently broader issue like police behavior? In fact, torture and race- or identity-based police brutality are intimately linked by the reality that lies at the foundation of institutionalized state torture.

Every nation that uses torture must first identify one or more groups of people who are torture’s “legitimate” targets. They are legitimate targets, because in the minds of the torturers and of the society that gives torture a home, these people are not entirely human. (In fact, the Chilean secret police called the people they tortured “humanoids.”) Instead, groups singled out for torture are a uniquely degraded and dangerous threat to the body politic, and therefore anything “we” must do to protect ourselves becomes licit. In the United States, with lots of encouragement from the news and entertainment media, many white people believe that African American men represent this kind of unique threat. The logic that allows police to kill unarmed Black men with impunity is not all that different from the logic that produces pogroms or underlies drone assassination programs in far-off places, or that makes it impossible to prosecute our own torturers.

Emphasis Mine

Torture is a reaction to an existental threat. It is used again the other who threatens the existence of society: be they Jew, Communist, Trade-Unionist, Catholic, Prostestant, Muslim, Non-White, Chinese, Indian, Sihk, Arab, etc.

Torture destroys what it seeks to protect: the superior civilization. For what is superior has no need of coercion, but only of reason. Torture is an admission that reason has failed.

Rather than confront why reason has failed, the torturers and their supporters seek to shore up their world through force. To question why reason has failed is question the superiority of their civilization. And questioning that is treason—an admission of failure. And superior civilizations never fail.

Torture destroys the humanity of both the tortured and the torturer through the destruction of their shared humanity. When the torturer fails to see in the pain and agony of the tortured their own suffering, they lose the empathy that is essential for humanity. When the tortured only sees the hatred and deafness to pleas of mercy of the torturers, they lose hope in a shared humanity.

Hearts of stone result from torture for the torturer and the tortured for this is the only way to survive the process. Humanity cannot be built out of hearts of stone, only buried within them.


Read more!

2014/12/22

'Talibanisation' of Pakistan and the Afghan war blowback

Farooq Tariq writes on the 'Talibanisation' of Pakistan and the Afghan war blowback.

The rise of religious fundamentalism has emerged as the most serious challenge not only to progressive forces but also to the very foundation of a modern society. Education and health are the real targets of the fanatics.

Religious fanatic groups are the new version of fascism. They are fascists in the making. They have all the historic characteristics of fascism. They kill opponents en mass. They have found considerable space among the middle class, particularly educated ones. They are against trade unions and social movements. They are promoting women as inferior to men, and aim to keep them in the home. Attacking religious minorities has become a norm.

Emphasis Mine

Fascism has its roots in the disaffected petite bourgeoisie. They see Capitalism as not working for them, but they still believe wholeheartedly in Capitalism. They then concoct various conspiracy theories to explain this contradiction.

Most of the time, these conspiracy theories revolve the ideal of morality. Capitalism is supposed to be the ideal moral system in which virtue and hard work are rewarded. Yet, they see that this is not the case.

So, they believe Capitalism has succumbed to moral pollution. In order to remedy this, they enlist religion as the cleansing force. In Spain and Italy, it was the Catholic Church. In Pakistan, it is Islam. In India, it is Hinduism. In Japan, it was Shintoism.

Tariq concludes that fundamentalism must be confronted:

There is no short cut to end religious fundamentalism. There is no military solution. It has to be a political fight with dramatic reforms in education, health and working realities in most Muslim countries. Starting from nationalisation of madrassas, it must go on to provide free education, health and transport as one of most effective means to counter fundamentalism.

Right-wing ideas are promoting extreme right-wing ideology. A mass working-class alternative in the shape of trade unions and political parties linked with social movements is the most effective manner to counter religious fundamentalism.

Emphasis Mine


Read more!